An analysis of the ripple effect of the round's results, according to the internet's
finest computer models.
[ Details ]
How It Works:
A team has a good round if it performs well, but also if other teams competing for the same ladder spots
perform poorly, since this reduces competition for those spots. This is an algorithmic ranking of the change
in each team's likely final ladder position due to the round's results.
Brisbane Lions by 41 points at Gabba
Hawthorn ▲+2.2
Brisbane Lions ▲+1.9
Western Bulldogs ▲+2.0
Fremantle ▲+0.7
Hawthorn by 39 points at M.C.G.
Western Bulldogs ▲+2.2
Collingwood ▲+1.5
Greater Western Sydney ▲+2.4
Brisbane Lions ▲+2.1
Adelaide ▲+0.7
Gold Coast ▲+0.6
St Kilda ▲+1.0
North Melbourne by 68 points at Adelaide Oval
Western Bulldogs ▲+1.5
Collingwood ▲+0.9
Brisbane Lions ▲+1.4
Greater Western Sydney ▲+1.7
Hawthorn ▲+1.7
Melbourne ▼-0.7
Port Adelaide by 25 points at Marrara Oval
Western Bulldogs ▲+1.6
Brisbane Lions ▲+1.5
Collingwood ▲+0.9
Hawthorn ▲+1.7
Greater Western Sydney ▲+1.8
Melbourne ▼-0.6
Collingwood by 6 points at S.C.G.
Hawthorn ▲+1.5
Brisbane Lions ▲+1.3
Geelong ▼-0.6
Essendon by 43 points at M.C.G.
Hawthorn ▲+1.5
Brisbane Lions ▲+1.2
Geelong ▼-0.7
Western Bulldogs by 12 points at Docklands
North Melbourne ▲+1.5
Essendon ▲+1.3
Port Adelaide ▲+1.4
Greater Western Sydney ▲+2.2
Greater Western Sydney by 17 points at Perth Stadium
Essendon ▲+1.2
Richmond ▲+1.2
Richmond by 36 points at Docklands
Greater Western Sydney ▲+1.4
Western Bulldogs ▲+1.2
Collingwood ▲+0.5
North Melbourne ▲+0.8
Melbourne ▼-1.0
St Kilda by 36 points at Docklands
West Coast ▼-1.2
Fremantle by 43 points at M.C.G.
West Coast ▼-1.2
Carlton ▼-1.3
Gold Coast by 25 points at Marrara Oval
Greater Western Sydney ▲+0.8
North Melbourne ▲+0.1
Carlton ▼-1.4
St Kilda ▼-0.6
Sydney by 6 points at S.C.G.
Western Bulldogs ▲+0.7
Greater Western Sydney ▲+0.8
Melbourne ▼-1.5
Adelaide ▼-0.9
Gold Coast ▼-0.9
St Kilda ▼-0.5
Adelaide by 68 points at Adelaide Oval
Greater Western Sydney ▲+0.6
Carlton ▼-1.5
Port Adelaide ▼-0.1
St Kilda ▼-0.8
West Coast by 17 points at Perth Stadium
St Kilda ▼-1.4
Port Adelaide ▼-0.8
Melbourne ▼-2.4
North Melbourne ▼-0.6
Carlton ▼-2.2
Carlton by 12 points at Docklands
Melbourne ▼-2.2
Adelaide ▼-1.5
Gold Coast ▼-1.6
Collingwood ▼-0.7
St Kilda ▼-1.2
Geelong by 41 points at Gabba
Hawthorn ▲+0.3
Geelong ▼-1.9
Gold Coast ▼-1.5
Melbourne ▼-2.1
Adelaide ▼-1.4
Fremantle ▼-1.2
Melbourne by 39 points at M.C.G.
Geelong ▼-2.2
Fremantle ▼-1.5
Sydney ▼-1.5
Gold Coast ▼-1.7
Adelaide ▼-1.7
Melbourne ▼-2.4Key
| HONOURABLE | Margin better than expected |
| ACCEPTABLE | Margin around expectation |
| DISHONOURABLE | Margin worse than expected |
| EXPECTED | Game won by favourite |
| CONTESTED | Neither team heavily favoured pre-match |
| UPSET | Game won by underdog |
About
To be ranked highly, a team should:
Win — ideally in an upset. It's always better to win, but computer models factor in the chances of each win already, and their ladder projections don't change much when teams win games they're expected to. The numbers do change when teams pull off an upset, since this accrues a win that wasn't previously accounted for.
Have other teams fighting for the same spots on the ladder lose, ideally in upsets. This is just as important, since it doesn't actually matter how many games you win — you just need more than your competition. When other teams projected to finish around the same area of the ladder lose, it makes it easier to take their spot (or stop them from taking yours). When they lose in upsets, it's especially good, since this means they are likely to exert less competitive pressure on higher ladder spots than previously believed.
Be more competitive than expected. Regardless of whether you win or lose, when a team exceeds expectations, it will be considered more likely to win in the future, and its projected numbers will shift upward accordingly. This is most visible in projected percentages, which almost always rise after a competitive performance, regardless of whether the game was won or lost.
Everything is relative! If a team pulls off a terrific upset win but so do other teams competing for the same ladder positions, no-one has gained much.
In general, you always want a team to lose if it is likely to finish near your team on the ladder, and to drop form if your team is fixtured to play them in the future. You don't care whether teams win or lose if they aren't competing for the same ladder positions, although it is helpful if they gain form ahead of playing your competitors.
Gaining/Losing Ground
Numbers beside each team indicate the change in relative projected wins. For example, if Brisbane Lions show "Gained ground against: St Kilda ▲-1.1," this means that the Lions have effectively gained 1.1 projected wins this round compared to the Saints — most likely a combination of the Lions now being projected to win more games than previously believed plus the Saints being projected to win fewer.
These lists are in approximate order of significance, which is a combined estimate of both how large the change is and how likely it is to affect this team's finishing position.
Algorithm v0.6
This analysis uses an algorithm to rate the importance of different movements, so that a team moving from 3rd to 2nd is considered more significant than a team moving from 13th to 12th. In particular, it considers:
Distance between teams before and after the round
Team rank before and after the round
Whether the team has moved into or out of the Top 2/4/8
Rounds remaining for teams to close gaps

















